The three-week review now takes an afternoon AI drafts each due-diligence answer with its source, and analysts decide

95%Less analyst time per review

8 weeksFrom architecture sign-off to acceptance

9/9Delivery milestones hit on the planned date

2–3 hrsPer manager review, down from two to three weeks

AI does the reading, and analysts do the judging

When a cycle closes, the reports, radar charts, and trend analyses build themselves, and every action lands on an audit trail nobody can edit.

Managers submit documentsThrough a secure portal, the same way every cycle.

AI reads themThe pipeline reads every document a manager sends.

AI drafts the answersEach answer links to the passage it came from.

Analysts validate and scoreThey check every draft and assign every score.

Analysts keep the scoringThe pipeline drafts. Analysts validate every draft and assign every score.

Every answer cites its sourceChecking a draft means following a reference, not rereading a manual.

Settle the risky assumptions firstThe questionnaire, calibration documents, and report template were agreed before development.

Run every review the same wayOne workspace, one questionnaire, and one scoring scale, every cycle.

Gate 1
Specifications approvedThe riskiest assumptions surfaced in week one, not week seven
Gate 2
Architecture signed offThe pipeline reads, and one workspace judges
Gate 3
Acceptance testing passedA working build, with critical defects cleared
Live
Impact trackedAnalyst time, throughput, and overrides, against the firm's own history

One or two analysts used to finish one or two reviews a month. Within weeks, Xponance approved a second phase with 24 enhancements.

71Reviews started in the first three weeks

13In active review at the three-week mark

3Already fully completed

We'll tell you which judgments must stay with your analysts, and when not to automate.